Allies vs Axis: Comparative Analysis of Strategic Approaches in World War II

Allies vs Axis: Comparison between strategic approaches in the World War II tells the difference between military, economic and diplomatic approaches used by the Allied powers, mainly the United States.

Soviet Union and the United Kingdom against the Axis powers led by Germany, Japan and Italy during the World War held between 1939 to 1945. Such is the importance pointed out by this kind of analysis of how strategic decisions determined the course of the war, whether Allies’ focus on coalition unity or Axis’ reliance on speedy conquests.

Through Allies vs Axis: Comparative Analysis of Strategic Approaches in World War II the readers learn the decisive factors deciding the victory and defeat in one of the most changing wars of history.

The keyword, Allies vs Axis: Comparative Analysis of Strategic Approaches in World War II, highlights the very fact that the study places an emphasis on analyzing tactical and ideological differences that characterized the conflict.

In Allies vs Axis: Comparative Comparisons of Strategies used in World War II, the Allies utilized enormous amounts of resources, great industrial power and combined efforts, such as the U.S. Lend Lease program.

That provided $50.1 billion in aid to allies such as the Soviet Union and joint operations like on D-Day, 1944, which deployed over 15 Attrition and power of numbers were at the fore of their strategy, evidenced by the Soviet’s Eastern Front offensives where 80% of the German casualties were caused.

On the other hand, the axis countries embarked on destructive blitzkrieg style that was fast and surprising, and in this regard, Germany’s early invasions of Poland and France were fast and surprising, while Japan’s pearl harbor attack in the year 1941 crippled the US navy.

However, Axis overstretch – Germany’s campaign in the Soviet Union and the Pacific wars pursued by Japan – stretched their thin resources to costs, as in Stalingrad and in Midway. Diplomatic unity of the Allies was formed by the 1943 Tehran Conference while Axis’ mistrust existed because the coalition of the Axis was undermined with Italy’s 1943 surrender.

Engaging with Allies vs Axis: Comparative Analysis of Strategic Approaches in World War II shows how the flexibility and interrelation of the Allies beat the initial drive of the Axis determining the course of the war and the modern world.