Facts of R v Pittwood (1902) Case Study

When Pittwood omitted his gate-closing duty on that day the train hit a car driver which ended in his fatal death. The following case analysis stems from R v. Pittwood (1902). In Facts of R v Pittwood (1902) Case Study the court established if Pittwood should face criminal prosecution for the death that resulted from his negligence as a gatekeeper.

The court established a duty of care through his employment requirement to close the gate during train passages because he received compensation for this task. The inability of Pittwood to close the gate resulted in a man’s death which constituted a major offense in court proceedings. The circumstances of employment generate responsibilities for individuals whose non-performance leads to criminal consequences.

The Importance of Duty and Responsibility in R v. Pittwood (1902): Case Study

All people must perform their duties within their workplace environment combined with their responsibilities at their residence and their roles as members of society. Every person must recognize the vital nature of executing their responsibilities with care. Occupations which maintain public safety require absolute caution because minor inactions can permanently modify the lives of others. The ” Facts of R v. Law expectations extend beyond actual actions to include not taking proper precautions which is demonstrated through The Facts of R v Pittwood (1902) Case Study.